[cdi-dev] Why are CDI 4.0 Full implementations required to also provide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdi-dev] Why are CDI 4.0 Full implementations required to also provide SE (e.g. jakarta.enterprise.inject.se.SeContainer*) support?

From: Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 13:16:35 -0400
Delivered-to: cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdi-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>, <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdi-dev>, <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1

Hi,

Why are CDI 4.0 Full implementations required to also implement the CDI SE interfaces like jakarta.enterprise.inject.se.SeContainer*? This came up in discussion on a JSON-B TCK challenge [1].

Thanks,
Scott

[1] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/326

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdi-dev] Why are CDI 4.0 Full implementations required to also provide SE (e.g. jakarta.enterprise.inject.se.SeContainer*) support?
  - From: Brian M Decker

Prev by Date: Re: [cdi-dev] Issue to resolve dependency for cdi tck 4.0.2
Next by Date: Re: [cdi-dev] Why are CDI 4.0 Full implementations required to also provide SE (e.g. jakarta.enterprise.inject.se.SeContainer*) support?
Previous by thread: [cdi-dev] Issue to resolve dependency for cdi tck 4.0.2
Next by thread: Re: [cdi-dev] Why are CDI 4.0 Full implementations required to also provide SE (e.g. jakarta.enterprise.inject.se.SeContainer*) support?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs