[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdi-dev] Add methods to BeanConfigurator for applying decorators
|
Personally I am -1 for this.
I have seen very little usage of decorators overall, especially compared to interceptors. And it's even declining in recent years.
Plus the addition would bring in more complexity just like it does with interceptors and creation of their subclass for programmatic usage.
And up until now, I haven't really seen a request for this. I guess I just don't see enough justification to go that way.
Furthermore, I vaguely remember this being a topic in a F2F prior to CDI 2.0. We decided to allow for programmatic interception in certain way (InterceptionFactory), but we deliberately *did not* add it for decorators.
I am not sure if those were just design decisions or also technical limitations, maybe Mark or Emily would remember?
Regards
M
----- Original Message -----
> From: "arjan tijms" <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "cdi developer discussions" <cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 4:09:06 PM
> Subject: [cdi-dev] Add methods to BeanConfigurator for applying decorators
>
> Hi,
>
> When adding a Bean via the BeanConfigurator, there's no option to apply its
> decorators. What about adding an option for that for CDI.Next?
>
> I created an issue for this: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/cdi/issues/459
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
