[cdi-dev] CDI TCK + Web Profile

["Brian M Decker" <bmdecker@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ach. Apologies for the lack of subject line in the initial post, and the subsequent need to spam the list with a second post to clarify that, but I thought putting a subject on the conversation would be useful for anyone looking through the archives in the future.

-Brian

Brian Decker
Rochester Blizzard
Jakarta Platform TCK Lead

Home Office
(612) 216-4881
Roch. Office
t/l 553-4686
bmdecker@xxxxxxxxxx

"Brian M Decker" ---06/04/2020 11:15:46 AM---Does anyone here have experience running the CDI TCK for Web Profile? Per the documentation, I'm su

From: "Brian M Decker" <bmdecker@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 06/04/2020 11:15 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cdi-dev] (no subject)
Sent by: cdi-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Does anyone here have experience running the CDI TCK for Web Profile? Per the documentation, I'm supposed to exclude the 'javaee-full' tests from the suite, which I can do successfully, but it also seems to introduce some strange Arquillian failures in my Jakarta EE8 environment.

Three tests (out of the ~1650 that run) fail with something like this:
[ERROR] arquillianBeforeTest(org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.conversation.event.TransientConversationLifecycleEventTest) Time elapsed: 1.44 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not lookup value for field private java.net.URL org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.conversation.event.TransientConversationLifecycleEventTest.contextPath
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Provider for type class java.net.URL returned a null value: org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.enricher.resource.URLResourceProvider@5082868e

In all three failures, the test in question has this:
@ArquillianResource(Servlet.class)
private URL contextPath;

This differs from all of the working tests, which merely have:
@ArquillianResource
private URL contextPath;

I am not enough of an Arquillian wizard to know why the difference in @ArquillianResource usage would matter or why merely running with an option to exclude additional tests would suddenly cause this test pattern to fail. Has anyone else tried to run this TCK in Web Profile mode and seen similar issues? If so, how did you resolve the problem?

Thanks.

-Brian

Brian Decker
Rochester Blizzard
Jakarta Platform TCK Lead

Home Office
(612) 216-4881
Roch. Office
t/l 553-4686
bmdecker@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev