Re: [bpel-dev] Questions about the "empty BPEL" template

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [bpel-dev] Questions about the "empty BPEL" template

From: Vincent Zurczak <vincent.zurczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:43:56 +0100
Delivered-to: bpel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/bpel-dev>
List-help: <mailto:bpel-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/bpel-dev>, <mailto:bpel-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/bpel-dev>, <mailto:bpel-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1

Hi,

Le 31/10/2011 17:52, Bob Brodt a écrit :

I agree, the empty process template is confusing at best. How about splitting this up as separate templates: an "almost empty" process with just a Receive and one with just a Pick activity? (but we should probably call them "Incomplete" rather than "Empty" Processes) At least those won't have validation errors.

The problem is that a receive or pick activity results in an error message if all its attributes are not set.
So, there would be an error annyway with these empty templates.

Regards,

Vincent.

--
Vincent Zurczak

R&D Engineer
Petals Link - SOA open-source company
http://vzurczak.wordpress.com
+33 (0) 4 76 96 15 16

References:
- Re: [bpel-dev] Questions about the "empty BPEL" template
  - From: Bob Brodt

Prev by Date: Re: [bpel-dev] Questions about the "empty BPEL" template
Next by Date: Re: [bpel-dev] Thoughts about how to use Git
Previous by thread: Re: [bpel-dev] Questions about the "empty BPEL" template
Next by thread: Re: [bpel-dev] Questions about the "empty BPEL" template
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs