Re: [aspectj-dev] Perobject (mini?)-bof at aosd?

[Adrian Colyer <adrian_colyer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd be interested in coming to that
discussion...
Cheers, Adrian.

-- Adrian
Adrian_Colyer@xxxxxxxxxx

Nicholas Lesiecki <ndlesiecki@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/03/2005 18:38

Please respond to
aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To	aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[aspectj-dev] Perobject (mini?)-bof at aosd?

Hi folks,

Eric Bodden emailed me to express interest in discussing per* aspects 
at AOSD. (See our earlier emails on this topic to the users' list for 
background.)


> I was wondering if you will be attending the AOSD conference and if
> so if you would probably like to have another chat about perobject
> association and in particular about association aspects and what are
> its pro's and con's.
>
> Fact is that for my current project I need to have some
> implementation that is at least similar to what association aspects
> do. And since I am using the abc compiler for my implementation it
> would make sense to do things right in the first place, so that
> people can probably reuse it lateron - at least for the purpose of
> research if not in a productive environment as with ajc.

  I'm planning to get together with him so l thought I'd invite anyone
who was interested on this list to join us. I'm particularly interested
in the contributions of compiler developers and/or skeptics (Wes) who 
might shed light on why the current implementation is superior to our 
proposals. We were thinking of some time on Monday (afternoon or 
evening) so as to avoid conflicting with the broader BOFs on Tuesday 
and Wednesday...

(apologies for the terseness of this email, I'm typing with a broken 
wrist)

Nicholas Lesiecki
Software Craftsman, specializing in J2EE,
Agile Methods, and aspect-oriented programming
m: 520 591-1849

Books:
* Mastering AspectJ: http://tinyurl.com/66vf
* Java Tools for Extreme Programming: http://tinyurl.com/66vt

Articles on AspectJ:
* http://tinyurl.com/66vu and http://tinyurl.com/66vv