[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[amalgam-dev] Re: oAW in Amalgam
|
Markus,
Typically components share the newsgroup of the containing and users are
asked prefix subjects headings, for example with [oAW]. After alll, you
have things like Xtext, XPand, and MWE spead across multiple projects and
there are newsgroups for those projects already too. So I expect you'd
use
news://news.eclipse.org/eclipse.modeling.amalgam
There is already a real CVS component as well:
(Embedded image moved to file: pic13846.jpg)
It's not clear what you mean by glue code. I imagine most if not all the
code is associated directly with Xpand, Xtend, Xtext, and MWE. What else,
specifically, is there that would not logically belong with the former
components?
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 313)
"Markus Voelter"
<voelter@googlema
il.com> To
"Richard Gronback"
04/02/2008 07:19 <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
AM voelter@xxxxxxx,
amalgam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Please respond to "Jean Bezivin"
voelter@xxxxxxx <jean.bezivin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ed
Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Subject
Re: oAW in Amalgam
Hi Rich,
> I'd say no proposal is necessary, just a patch applied to Bugzilla (the
> usual process). This way, we can take a look at the extent of what's
> being proposed. For now, the only artifact in the Amalgam repo is an EPP
> definition for the general Modeling package. I expect an "oAW"
> definition that would include Xpand/Xtend/MWE/Xtext is the place to
> start?
yes, but we do need real a repository where we can
put the "glue" code as well as a newsgroup for support.
Markus
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>
> On 4/1/08 11:34 AM, "Ed Merks" <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Markus,
>>
>> I imagine it would involve just a feature definition for pulling
>> together a
>> subset of the things Amalgam itself is already pulling together. I
>> doubt
>> it needs to be a separate project. Rich is the lead for the project, so
>> it's best to take direction from him on how to proceed? I wonder what
>> steps need to be taken to ensure that oAW is an Eclipse brand and that
>> we
>> don't get flak from the foundation about it...
>>
>>
>> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
>> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
>> 905-413-3265 (t/l 313)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Markus Voelter"
>> <voelter@googlema
>> il.com>
>> To
>> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
>> 04/01/2008 11:05
>> cc
>> AM "Richard Gronback"
>> <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> "Jean Bezivin"
>> Please respond to <jean.bezivin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> voelter@xxxxxxx
>> Subject
>> oAW in Amalgam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> what are the next steps we need to take to get oAW
>> under Amalgam, as discussed at EclipseCon? Do we need
>> to write a project proposal?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Markus
>>
>> --
>>
>> Markus Völter
>>
>> voelter - ingenieurbüro für softwaretechnologie
>> Grabenstrasse 4, 73033 Goeppingen, Germany
>> Tel. +49 (0) 171 / 86 01 869
>> Email: voelter@xxxxxxx
>>
>> Web: http://www.voelter.de
>> Blog: http://www.voelter.de/blog
>> Podcast: http://www.se-radio.net
>>
>> PGP Public Key: http://www.voelter.de/data/MarkusVoelter.gpg
>>
>>
>
--
Markus Völter
voelter - ingenieurbüro für softwaretechnologie
Grabenstrasse 4, 73033 Goeppingen, Germany
Tel. +49 (0) 171 / 86 01 869
Email: voelter@xxxxxxx
Web: http://www.voelter.de
Blog: http://www.voelter.de/blog
Podcast: http://www.se-radio.net
PGP Public Key: http://www.voelter.de/data/MarkusVoelter.gpg
Attachment:
pic13846.jpg
Description: JPEG image