[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ajdt-dev] -XnoWeave and gutters
|
for reweavable: yes/no
If you assume that other weaver exists, especially VM ones that don't
deal with bytecode (or almost don't) then what you'd like is really an
unweaved bytecode and not a weaved one from which you can recover
(else you are back in dealing with bytecode to unweave everything
somehow)
On that topic I actually think that AJDT itself should not rely at all
on what the weaver emits. I think Eclipse JDT structures (same for
Intellij PSI structures and so on of modern IDEs) are rich enough to
provide all information needed to do the matching. The key piece then
becomes the reflective access to the aspects information so that their
structure (binary or source) can be taken as input (ok that 's
probably a huge work).
An analogy is that somehow modern IDE don't do compilation (weaving)
and don't query the java.lang.reflect API (weaver output) to show you
a class hierarchy (advised by/advises), but they do that with their
internals, handling both source and binary represented super classes
(I actually think that the draft of AJ support that surfaced in an old
version of IntelliJ was doing so).
Alex
On 6/20/05, Andrew Clement <CLEMAS@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Unfortunately all that information comes out of the weaving process... no
> weaving = no gutter annotations.
>
> I have been thinking of breaking this process into pieces, since it is the
> weaving bit thats expensive - if AJDT enabled you to develop code, compiled
> it, showed the matches but didn't weave until later (perhaps application
> launch time) then we might be a bit faster.
>
> However, -XnoWeave is a hokey option we've been talking about dropping for
> a while - when reweavable then you'll always get the matches shown *and*
> you'll be able to weave again later.
>
> Andy.
>
>
>
>
> Alexandre Vasseur
> <avasseur@gmail.c
> om> To
> Sent by: AspectJ Development Tools developer
> ajdt-dev-bounces@ discussions <ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> eclipse.org cc
> Jonas Bonér <jboner@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject
> 20/06/2005 11:42 [ajdt-dev] -XnoWeave and gutters
>
>
> Please respond to
> Alexandre Vasseur
> <avasseur@gmail.c
> om>; Please
> respond to
> AspectJ
> Development
> Tools developer
> discussions
> <ajdt-dev@eclipse
> .org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> If I am using -XnoWeave (or equivalent checkbox) in AJDT, is there a
> way to still have the gutter and those things ?
>
> It sounds like when I use -XnoWeave all this information is gone.
> That kind of behavior would be usefull to have AJDT for the developer,
> and have the weaving be done by the runtime later on - f.e.
>
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
