From:
ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ron Bodkin
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 1:18 AM
To: 'AspectJ Development
Tools developer discussions'
Subject: RE: [ajdt-dev] Back Port
to 2.1?
Hi Matt,
I think the main areas that would be
integrating more recent versions of AspectJ and providing some level of
compatibility and key bug fixes so developers could see how aspects developed
in Eclipse 3.x AJDT’s impact code, even if they lack the niceties of
editing (e.g., making annotations work properly etc.).
From:
ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt Chapman
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 11:33 AM
To: AspectJ Development Tools
developer discussions
Subject: Re: [ajdt-dev] Back Port
to 2.1?
"Ron Bodkin"
<rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 10/06/2005 18:40:36:
> I have a client who is stuck on WSAD 5 (based
on Eclipse 2.1) for
> about 6 months. Do you have a sense of what
it would take to back
> port recent AJDT versions to support Eclipse
2.1?
Hi Ron,
It's simply
not possible, in anything approaching a complete way. Much of AJDT's
functionality is bound up tightly with Eclipse, and not only has the Eclipse
code changed significantly between 2.1 and 3.0, many of the extension points
and techniques we use were not available there. The best you could do would be
to target very specific bug fixes and areas of functionality, and consider
whether those in isolation could be back ported - some could, some couldn't.
Are there any particular features they're looking for?
Regards,
Matt.
