You mean that “PolarSys IDE 0.7.1” should be better. It’s true that we had the question “What’s the difference with PolarSys IDE 0.7?”.
Then, I guess that:
· We rename “PolarSys IDE 0.8” in “PolarSys IDE 0.7.1”
· We keep a release documentation to trace the release with its differences
· No release review is required
Thanks,
Benoît
De : Wayne Beaton [mailto:wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2014 18:05
À : LANGLOIS Benoit; 3p-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [3p-dev] PolarSys IDE 0.8
On 02/24/2014 11:09 AM, LANGLOIS Benoit wrote:
1. Plugins and features are still the same, except that we changed the PolarSys IDE version number. Do we need to submit an IP log?
No. If there are no actual intellectual property changes, then a new IP Log is not required.
2. Can we submit a review documentation even if we don’t have the version number of the aggregated components?
Strictly speaking, this sounds very similar conceptually to a "service release" (AKA "bugfix" release). There are no significant new features, and no new IP. According to the EDP, no review is required.
Service releases are typically denoted by an increment of third segment, but there is no specific rule that requires this.
The project may benefit from the extra exposure that comes with a review, so you may want to consider doing one anyway.
But it's up to you.
Wayne