In my opinion I think creating a new
repo is better and we can archive the old repos after sufficient
time has passed.
Thanh
On 09/01/14 06:04 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
Just an extra question before we do anything: Shouldn't we rather
create a new "webtools.jsdt" repository to avoid confusion with
previous "splitted" repositories? So webtools.jsdt.* would remain
the old splitted repositories, and webtools.jsdt would start for
the new merged repo.
So the choice is between:
. "Keep-Old/Merge in .core"
.. Benefit: no extra repository
.. Drawback: It doesn't make clear that .core is the only active
repository and that .debug and .tests are inactive
. "Keep-Old/Create-New"
.. Benefit: We can make clear that all webtools.jsdt.* are no more
active and that only webtools.jsdt is
.. Drawback: One new repo
FWIW, I favor the Keep-Old/Create-New.
As there is a JSDT meeting later today, it would be nice if you
could discuss it between JSDT committers and decide which one of
this approach fits better for JSDT.
If you go for "Keep-Old/Create-New" then I think the very next
step will be that project lead (Chris) immediatly open a bug to
webmaster asking for creation of this repository. Once it
available, a committer can push the branch https://github.com/mickaelistria/webtools.jsdt.core/tree/424210-master
as master to the new repositories.
And if you go for "Keep-Old/Merge in .core", then a committer can
already push the branch https://github.com/mickaelistria/webtools.jsdt.core/tree/424210-master
into webtools.jsdt.core master.
Cheers,
_______________________________________________
wtp-releng mailing list
wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng
|