Re: [wtp-releng] Smoke Test Request for WTP 3.1 I-build

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The rule is zero errors for any declared build ... it is easier to bend the rule for weekly builds, but our goal is zero errors, and anything that causes a JUnit failure can be considered "blocking" (thus justifies a respin). If for some reason it can not be done for a weekly build, a note explaining that would be in order.


Angel Vera ---01/23/2009 10:45:24 AM---I thought we were only required to declare with 0 versioning errors on point and full releases, as o

From:	Angel Vera <arvera@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wtp-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	01/23/2009 10:45 AM
Subject:	Re: [wtp-releng] Smoke Test Request for WTP 3.1 I-build
Sent by:	wtp-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

I thought we were only required to declare with 0 versioning errors on point and full releases, as opposed from our weekly releases. 

I was planning to released them after I personally completed the smoke test.

Best Regards,
-- --
Mr. Angel Vera
Server Tools Developer for WTP and Rational
Lotus Notes: Angel Vera/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Tel: 905-413-5919 - E-Mail: arvera@xxxxxxxxxx
-----
Those who think that something is impossible,
should not interfere with those who are willing to do it. - Angel Vera

David M Williams ---01/22/2009 08:32:46 PM---> I will fix the version level for Servertools right after the smoke test.

From:	David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	01/22/2009 08:32 PM
Subject:	Re: [wtp-releng] Smoke Test Request for WTP 3.1 I-build
Sent by:	wtp-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

> I will fix the version level for Servertools right after the smoke test.
>
> Bundles with versioning errors
> org.eclipse.wst.server.ui.doc.user
> 1.1.100.v200810082047 (current)
> 1.1.100.v200810082048 (reference)
Do you mean "after you personally finish the smoke test" or "after we declare"?

I ask since we should declare with 0 JUnit failures, and versioning fixes are part of that, so it is ok (required even :) to release a fix for versioning problems.
It appears it is not only you that need to release some versioning fixes.

Bundles with versioning errors
org.eclipse.wst.server.ui.doc.user

1.1.100.v200810082047 (current)
1.1.100.v200810082048 (reference)

org.eclipse.wst.wsdl.ui.doc.user

1.0.501.v200810081956 (current)
1.0.501.v200810081958 (reference)

Bundles with qualifier-only increases

org.eclipse.jst.ws.consumption.ui.doc.user

1.0.500.v200810082021 (current)
1.0.500.v200810082020 (reference)

org.eclipse.wst.common.tests.validation.guard

1.0.1.v200810221132 (current)
1.0.1.v200810221129 (reference)

org.eclipse.wst.xmleditor.doc.user

1.0.500.v200810081959 (current)
1.0.500.v200810081958 (reference)

Features with qualifier-only increases
org.eclipse.wst.server_userdoc.feature

3.0.100.v200810082054-108Y7w311921193158 (current)
3.0.100.v200810082053-108Y7w311921193159 (reference)

org.eclipse.wst.ws_userdoc.feature

3.0.2.v200810081945-34EFC9oA55S6J6S9NEP (current)
3.0.2.v200810081944-34EDe9oA55S6I5S8KCS (reference) _______________________________________________
wtp-releng mailing list
wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng

_______________________________________________
wtp-releng mailing list
wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng