Agreed – you’re in a pre-1.0
release, so changing the packages later seems acceptable. You should warn
adopters of the planned repackaging.
From:
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 9:19
AM
To: WTP PMC communications
(including coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)
Cc: WTP PMC communications
(including coordination, announcements, and Group discussions);
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [wtp-pmc] Package
name for JSF project..
Raghu,
Since
the 1.5 release for JSF is being positioned as a Tech Preview or similar, I
think you can defer the package rename. I suggest you focus on quality now.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
Raghu Srinivasan
<raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/14/2006 01:52 PM
Please
respond to
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and
Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
"WTP PMC communications (including
coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)"
<wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[wtp-pmc] Package name for JSF project..
|
|
Hi,
We currently use the prefix, org.eclipse.wtp.jsf,
in the package name
and plugin ID. However, once we exit incubation, I
believe the project
will be a component of jst and hence the right
prefix would be
org.eclipse.jst.jsf.
I need guidance on the following:
1) Is, org.eclipse.jst.jsf, the right package name
for the project?
2) Can we defer the refactoring to post1.5
release?
Thanks
Raghu
_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc