[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [wtp-incubator-dev] XSL checking as "nature + builder" vs "WTP validator"
|
Jesper Steen Møller wrote:
Hi guys
I'm porting over the validation + UI portions of the X-Assist plugins,
adding some validation tricks as I go.
We've previously discussed whether to use a XSL validator or a
specific XSL project nature with a builder.
In light of the new validation framework to appear in the next major
WTP [1] I think it would make the most sense to stick with the "WTP
validation" direction, primarily because it makes the XSL support work
"out of the box" and in a less intrusive manner.
In fact, I'd rather do it this way, and then in return help out on the
validation UI stuff to make it on par with the user experience of the
Java tooling, as suggested by Dave.
I should be able to make it backwards compatible with the current WTP
2.0 as well.
Sounds good to me.
I'm in the process of finishing up some work on the proof of concept
migration for the SSE and XML UIs in bug 212330. I should have the
last two major pieces done. Once you two are to the point where you
feel it's ready for a useability test let me know, and I'll put it
through one of my daily routines in regards to XSL work.