Re: [virgo-dev] Would you like to try debugging a Gemini Blueprint issue

[Konstantinos Mavridis <konstantinos.mavridis@xxxxxxxx>]

Dmitry, thanks for the help this worked well.

+1 on adding an extension point as it would provide separation between the business logic and the osgi references / activation mechanism.

regards,
Konstantinos

> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:47:35 -0500
> From: dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [virgo-dev] Would you like to try debugging a Gemini Blueprint issue (with ECF)?
>
> I pushed an example based on using ServiceReference injection vs. backing service object as discussed in the prior email
>
> See https://github.com/dsklyut/bluECF
>
> I will circle back with Glynn to see if there is a merit in providing ProxyCreator extension point. I think there is as demonstrated here. For example if service property xyz == true try to apply IRemote interface - but only if that IRemote interface is visible form service importer class loader.
>
> Regards,
> Dmitry
>
>
> --
> Dmitry Sklyut
> Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)