Re: [viatra-dev] [458324] Build job restructure

[István Ráth <rath@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think these two cases can only be handled by one of the co-leads. Zoli?

On 3 Feb 2015 at 12:32:53, David, Istvan (davidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

Okay, so now only the project website and the git repo are left. I assume there's an official way to do these, maybe a bugzilla ticket in the appropriate tracker? If you give me some pointers, I'll handle it.

2015-02-02 19:36 GMT+01:00 David, Istvan <davidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Sure, no problem.

Update:

-renamed the releng projects (see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=458324)

-turned on the JUnit test result publication for the viatra-master job and added a /tests folder to the repo

2015-02-02 18:35 GMT+01:00 Ujhelyi Zoltán <ujhelyiz@xxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi,

as I have written in the original bug, all projects should be reviewed and renamed as necessary. The only project, that has any reasonable cause to refer have the EMF in its name is the transformation API project, from any other project the EMF postfix should be removed. Furthermore, I have absolutely no objection from removing it from the transformation projects name as well.

And to second Ábel, thanks for your effort, it is greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
Zoli
-- Zoltán Ujhelyi
https://www.inf.mit.bme.hu/en/members/ujhelyiz

Fault Tolerant Systems Research Group
Budapest University of Technology and Economics

> On 2015. febr. 2., at 18:26, David, Istvan <davidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Cool, thanks. Any opinion on the releng stuff?
>
> What about the releng projects?
> -org.eclipse.viatra.emf.parent
> -org.eclipse.viatra.emf.target
> -org.eclipse.viatra.emf.update
> I think they should be renamed as well.
>
>
>
>
> 2015-02-02 16:15 GMT+01:00 Ábel Hegedüs <abel.hegedus@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 2015.02.02. 13:18:53, David, Istvan <davidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Also: the org.eclipse.viatra.emf.runtime.feature project should be renamed to org.eclipse.viatra.emf.feature, as there will be DSL, UI and other plugins related to the same module (EMF).
> [Abel]: In my opinion, it is okay as it is exactly for the reason you mentioned. When we have UI plugins, we will probably put them in a different feature (viatra.emf.ui) to avoid requiring UI dependencies for an application that only uses the runtime.
>> Please, let me know what do you think and I'll handle the renaming.
>>
>> In the meantime, the build jobs have been renamed as discussed.
> [Abel]: Thanks for all the clean-up so far!
>
> _______________________________________________
> viatra-dev mailing list
> viatra-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/viatra-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> viatra-dev mailing list
> viatra-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/viatra-dev

_______________________________________________
viatra-dev mailing list
viatra-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/viatra-dev

_______________________________________________
viatra-dev mailing list
viatra-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/viatra-dev

-- 
István Ráth
Research Fellow

Fault Tolerant Systems Research Group

Budapest University of Technology and Economics

http://inf.mit.bme.hu/en/members/rath

rath@xxxxxxxxxx