| Re: [unide-dev] 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT: new website / repo structure / fixed schemas |
Correct, sorry. I thought the Python binding still was in the "check-in approved" phase, which would have implied the IP team was still working on completing the due diligence. A quick look at all the Unide CQs allows me to clarify the confusion I just brought: all the CQs for the project are fully resolved, so getting an IP log approved should not be a big deal. Axel, I don’t see a CQ for your "BINSA" contribution? Benjamin - > Le 17 janv. 2018 à 16:54, Frank Patz-Brockmann <frank.patz-brockmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> What needs to be highlighted though, is that having the Python biding will require the associated CQ to be fully approved by the IP team, so Axel, make sure to give the IP team a heads-up that you have a release coming. > > I was under the impression that the CQs for the Python binding *had* been approved? Not? > > - frank > _______________________________________________ > unide-dev mailing list > unide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/unide-dev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP