FYI,
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/IP/Test_and_Build_Dependencies
TL;DR: Build and test dependencies can be classified as "works with"
Wayne
On 07/10/14 12:12 AM, David M Williams
wrote:
Same as Bison, if this is a development
time dependency only, not checked into Git, and not distributed,
then sounds
ok as "works with", to me.
(I'm not even sure "development
time only" dependencies are technically "works with", or
... if there is some better classification ... but, I believe as
long as
not put in Git repo, and not distributed with project, that there
are not
many limits on "development time only" tools.)
From:
emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
To:
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:
10/03/2014 03:41 PM
Subject:
[tools-pmc]
[CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to
full IP review
Sent by:
tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8768
Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed
|Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|new
|awaiting_pmc
--- Comment #3 from Sharon Corbett
<sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2014-10-03
15:41:01 ---
Auto-Generated Text: IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.
--
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
 |
