| Re: [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to full IP review |
|
If you haven't noticed, I'm not commenting at all on these. I've become quite dissillusioned in this process. I'm not sure why these guys just didn't CQ the Linux kernel too since these tools run there (sorry for the overstatement). Where do you draw the
line? Who is this helping?
Doug.
Same as Bison, if this is a development time dependency only, not checked into Git, and not distributed, then sounds ok as "works with", to me.
From: David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Oct 07 2014 00:12:50 GMT-0400 (EDT) To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to full IP review (I'm not even sure "development time only" dependencies are technically "works with", or ... if there is some better classification ... but, I believe as long as not put in Git repo, and not distributed with project, that there are not many limits on "development time only" tools.) From: emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx To: tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, Date: 10/03/2014 03:41 PM Subject: [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to full IP review Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8768 Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|new |awaiting_pmc --- Comment #3 from Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2014-10-03 15:41:01 --- Auto-Generated Text: IPTeam awaiting response from PMC. -- Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the CQ. _______________________________________________ tools-pmc mailing list tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc |