Re: [threadx-dev] help

[<smdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Metehan

 

When I did the SIL course about 2 years ago there was no OS SIL certified.

I would suggest to use BareMetal to ensure SIL compliance.

Please also stick to Basic C.

 

 

 

Kind Regards

 

Sean Du Toit

 

 

From: Metehan Uzun <metehanuzun@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2024 9:59 AM
To: smdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ThreadX project developer discussion <threadx-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [threadx-dev] help

 

I'm asking to be sure. I don't comply with SIL standards in any way by using ThreadX, do I? Do you suggest I use BareMetal for this?

 

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:51 <smdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Good day Metehan

 

As far as I am aware none of the free Embedded RTOS type platforms are SIL 3 or SIL 4 compatible.

I am under correction, but I think there is a SIL3 RTOS but you have to pay for it.

 

If you want full SIL4, BareMetal in standard C is the best option. The rules for SIL4 is quite strict.

BareMetal in any case gives you more control over the hardware.

 

Hope this helps.

 

 

 

Kind Regards

 

Sean Du Toit

 

 

From: threadx-dev <threadx-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Metehan Uzun via threadx-dev
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 2:31 PM
To: threadx-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Metehan Uzun <metehanuzun@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [threadx-dev] help

 

  Hello, I am Metehan from Turkey. I am an embedded software engineer in a private company.
We are developing a project and we want to keep this project within the scope of sil4 certificate.  We use STM32F407VET6 and STM32F746VGT6 microprocessors. We want to use Azure RTOS (now known as ThreadX) to be within SIL4 scope. I had a few questions about this.

1- Is ThreadX completely free? So what do we need to do to ensure it is within SIL4 (maybe SIL3) scope?
2- Is there IP Stack support?

3- Is it compatible with the microprocessors we use?