| Re: [technology-pmc] Committer Election for Matic Petric on Eclipse Qrisp has started |
Hi Wayne,just checking if this election is okay from your side now? We appreciate the care the Eclipse foundation puts in making sure only relevant people get to enter the team!Best,RaphaelAm Di., 30. Jan. 2024 um 17:59 Uhr schrieb Raphael Seidel <raphaelsdel@xxxxxxxxx>:We did the development on our internal GitLab Server until now because when we became an Eclipse Project, our GitLab server had many branches, which deterred us from having a transition. For 0.4 we merged most of these branches and will from now on start development on the GitHub repo. I can show you the commits - do you want them as a screenshot?- Matic and Niklas did significant work on the QAOA Module. For instance, Matic wrote three out of four tutorials and the QUBO feature. Niklas implemented 7 different QAOA Problem instances and did a lot of restructuring in the QAOAProblem class.- Rene implemented the quantum amplitude amplification, the quantum amplitude estimation and the numerical integration. Furthermore he identified and solved several important Bugs for the Backtracking algorithm.To identify these features please use the search function on our documentation website www.qrisp.euAm Di., 30. Jan. 2024 um 17:52 Uhr schrieb Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:Past contributions can be cited as merit. It would be best if you can provide links or cite specific contributions. If the commits have been squashed, perhaps you can point to some specific feature that the individual has contributed.As I dig through your Git repository, I've noticed some rather large commits labeled, for example "VERSION 0.4" (contributed last week). This suggests to me that the actual development work is being done in a different repository and periodically squashed and pushed to the Eclipse project's repository. Is this how development is done on this project?To subscribe to the mailing list, point your committers here, and have them log in and click the "Subscribe" button: https://accounts.eclipse.org/mailing-list/qrisp-devWayneOn Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 11:24, Raphael Seidel <raphaelsdel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Wayne,We just recently moved our development to GitHub and previously had an internal GitLab server. The candidates I nominated all contributed frequently for at least 6 months. I attached a screenshot of Niklas' commit history. If you want more proof I am happy to share.Regarding the issue of the mailing list: We will figure out who is missing. How can we add them?Cheers,RaphaelAm Di., 30. Jan. 2024 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:Greetings Eclipse Qrisp team.I've noticed that there are only three subscribers to your mailing list. I don't actually have access to the subscriber list, so I can only assume that at least one of the project committers is not subscribed to the list and will not have received the notice that the election has started. Please connect with your team to ensure that everybody is subscribed to qrisp-dev.As you know, our open source rules of engagement require that project teams operate in an open, transparent, and meritocratic manner.For committer elections, the employer and what role the candidate plays within the team are not relevant criteria. Rather, committer status is granted based on the public contribution record of the individual. That is, committer elections (and project lead elections) must include a public demonstration of merit. Specifically, the nomination statement for an election should provide examples of how the candidate has demonstrated an understanding of the role they're being elected to. This demonstration is for both the project team and for the community.AFAICT, the candidate has created two pull requests. You should cite them in the nomination statement. As people who are not directly involved in the project, it is difficult for the PMC to determine whether or not this constitutes enough merit, so the PMC defers to your judgement.So... if somebody from the community were to show up to your project and make the same contributions as this candidate, would you nominate them to join the team as a committer? If your honest answer to his question is no, then we should terminate this election and the candidate should be encouraged to make further contributions before starting the election again in the future.Please let us know if you have any questions.WayneOn Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 10:15, EMO EMO via technology-pmc <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:A committer election for Matic Petric on project Eclipse Qrisp
(technology.qrisp) was started by Raphael Seidel with this criteria:
Matic is a core member of the Team at Fraunhofer and needs to have access to
the GitHub repo.
Eclipse Qrisp project committers can click the election link below to vote.
Election:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.qrisp/elections/election-matic-petric-committer-eclipse-qrisp
Project: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.qrisp
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
My working day may not be your working day! Please don’t feel obliged to read or reply to this e-mail outside of your normal working hours.
--Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
My working day may not be your working day! Please don’t feel obliged to read or reply to this e-mail outside of your normal working hours.
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
My working day may not be your working day! Please don’t feel obliged to read or reply to this e-mail outside of your normal working hours.
