[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[technology-pmc] Committer Nominations
|
Technology PMC Members,
Given the recent case - I'd like to have a discussion about the "meritocratic nature" of the nomination process.
I see the following possibilities for demonstrating merit:
(1) Contributions to an existing projects
-> proof is Gerrit, bugs with patches, pull requests and/or wiki edits
(2) Ownership of new component brought (migrated) into a project
-> proof is CQ with source and commit/author info (ideally log)
(3) Project reboot (existing committers are inactive and need to be replaced to keep project alive)
-> proof of inactivity
Thoughts?
Note:
> Even worse, there is a +1 vote from another committer with the comment "I don't know who this person is." (!).
That's a clear no-go. It's our responsibility as a PMC to catch this. For me this translates into a -1 (ignoring the actual vote). As such, I'd immediately veto the committer election.
-Gunnar
