Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Vote for Committer status for Jonah Graham was started by Erwin De Ley
PMC members,

For what it's worth, Jonah is well-known in the science group and by me, and his contributions are many and much appreciated.
He has just not yet contributed to Triquetrum as we're a young project, and he was not added upfront as a committer in the proposal (which would have passed without these reactions).

At today's unconference in Toulouse, Jonah has kindly offered to migrate previous work into Triquetrum, on a specific way to integrate between Java & external Python processes.
This is a thing of great value for scientific workflows.
He and Matt were the core developers on the previous implementation (Matt knows Jonah well, just made a sarcastic joke which was well understood by our group).

So it only seemed correct for me that this would be formalized by having Jonah as committer for his work.
If this is not sufficient as merit (i.e. only historical merit tracked in eclipse tools is acceptable for some reason), we'll take the overhead of handling this in another way.
I would hope that the resulting contributions can then count as proof-of-merit to give Jonah a-posteriori the committer status to help maintaining this and to be able to add further value and skills to our team and the project.

regards
erwin


Op 10/06/2016 om 21:02 schreef Jay Jay Billings:

Is there project lead training or education materials?

I read some wiki articles, attended committer bootcamp at ECNA14, messed up my first committer nomination, and now email you guys, my mentor or Wayne if I have questions.

So that's a smart way of saying we probably need to be talking about a lack of training as the root cause.

Jay

On Jun 10, 2016 1:48 PM, "Eric Rizzo" <eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That bug, and the ones that it links to, are good but I think we also need to address a more fundamental root cause. It should not surprise a project lead that he needs to provide evidence of merit; it should be part of what he is educated about in the process of becoming a committer and project lead.
I'll be honest: it absolutely shocks me that we have people in the position of project leadership who do not fundamentally understand this. *That* is what I consider more important than making the system prompt and/or enforce; if we solve the root problem, those other things are just convenient reminders.

Like many problems in software development, it seems like it's really a communication problem.

Eric
June 10, 2016 1:26 PM

Guys,

I think this is the bug:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=460734

Jay

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
June 10, 2016 12:50 PM

Guys,

I totally agree. Unfortunately Erwin didn't reach out to the other committers before nominating Jonah, so I didn't get to tell him about the meritocratic requirement. This wouldn't be a problem if it was on the form, I think.

Jay

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
June 10, 2016 10:35 AM
Totally agree.

I need to check, but I recall filing an issue awhile ago about having the committer nomination form require listing issues and git commits as contributions (as part of the nomination process). Seems like a very small change to make.




--
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
June 10, 2016 10:33 AM
PMC members,
I know I've raised concern about this before, but here is another committer nomination that demonstrates fundamental misunderstanding of the process and its meritocratic nature. Even worse, there is a +1 vote from another committer with the comment "I don't know who this person is." (!). To me, that's a big warning sign that the project members have not been well-informed about how things are supposed to work.
Here's the thing, the project mentors are Wayne and Jonas, both of whom I have faith are good at being mentors, among the best. So where is the process failing these new projects and their leaders? It happens often enough that I think there is a gap somewhere; I'm just not experienced in the new project on-boarding process to know where that gap might be.

Yes, I know it's easy to educate them at this point - but I'm trying to figure out how we can prevent these kinds of nominations, not just put out the fires as they flare up.

Eric

June 10, 2016 10:03 AM
technology.triquetrum Committers,
This automatically generated message signals that Erwin De Ley has
nominated Jonah Graham as a Committer on the technology.triquetrum project.
The reason given is as follows:

Jonah has deep expertise on integrating python in java & rcp, and on
eclipse software dvp for science.

He will be valuable for the line of work in Triquetrum related to
connectors to other languages, and other science-related extensions.

thanks
erwin


The vote is being held via the MyFoundation portal: voters *must* use the
portal for the votes to be properly recorded. The voting will continue
until either all 5 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least
one week). Jonah Graham must receive at least three +1s and no -1s for a
successful election.

Eligible Committers must cast their votes through their My Foundation
portal page (do NOT just reply to this email; your vote will not be
correctly recorded unless you use the portal):

http://portal.eclipse.org/

The project Committers eligible to vote are:

Jay Billings
Christopher Brooks
Erwin De Ley
Matthew Gerring
Alex McCaskey

*NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 120 days to
allow for processing of paperwork. After that time the election will be
expired, regardless of its current status. Should papework processing on
the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will
have to be held.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc


_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc


_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc


Back to the top