Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval request for ACTF 1.4 (Neon) release

[Eric Rizzo <eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The review material looks good, but I do have a question about the internal classes and reflection use that is mentioned. I see that the 2 bugs about migrating away from that are about 7 years old, with no updates since the original creation. What, if any, progress has been made with the SWT team to either expose what ACTF needs or assist in writing alternatives? Have you tried to engage SWT about these?

Eric

Kentarou Fukuda

June 1, 2016 1:45 AM

Dear Technology PMC,

Would you please review our release review document and approve ACTF 1.4
(Neon) release?

Release review document:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.4.0/review

Approved IP Log:
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11466

Release track bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=494460

Many thanks,
Kentarou
---
Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
IBM Research - Tokyo
Tel: +81-3-3808-5252
E-mail: kentarou@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

---