Hi Mark.
You can post multiple attachments on a single CQ (I think that's
what you're asking). Or you can lump them together as a single
contribution. The IP Team doesn't really care whether or not the
contributions are functionally related. If everything is coming from
the same source (IBM), you should be okay.
You can then push each of those contributions as a separate commits
(preserving author information) if that makes sense.
Does this answer your question?
Wayne
On 14/04/16 12:06 PM, Mark Stoodley
wrote:
Hi,
For the OMR project, several
committers
from IBM have been lining up significant contributions (>
1000 lines
each) from a pre-existing proprietary code base. IBM is
expecting to continue
this process through 2016.
We have been filing an individual
CQ
for each of these contributions and requesting to use the
parallel IP process,
but even so our CQs sometimes take a while to get the necessary
approvals
to commit to the project repo.
I know the parallel IP process is
already
streamlining things greatly here, but is there any way to
further streamline
the process for these multiple expected contributions? Since
they are all
basically the same pedigree (IBM, multiple authors), is there
any way "reuse"
one CQ (they are all still open) so we can move this code into
the OMR
repository more efficiently?
|
|
| Mark
Stoodley |
8200
Warden Avenue |
|
| Senior
Software Developer |
Markham,
L6G 1C7 |
| IBM
Runtime Technologies |
Canada |
| Phone: |
+1-905-413-5831 |
|
|
| e-mail: |
mstoodle@xxxxxxxxxx |
|
|
We cannot solve our
problems with the same
thinking we used when we created them - Albert Einstein |
| |
| |
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
|
