What do you all think about filing a new bug
to have the requirement dropped?
+1
Wayne
On 26/02/16 08:17 AM, Eric Rizzo wrote:
Something that's bugged me for a while is how the portal requires
a comment when PMC approves a committer election. Do we *ever*
have anything besides token comments like "welcome" in there? I
don't recall ever seeing a single meaningful comment in the
hundreds of elections we've approved in my time on the PMC.
Do other project PMC's use meaningful comments?
I found this old bug from 2007 (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=203314)
where the requirement was established, but the "guidance about
what should be in the comment" isn't there.
What do you all think about filing a new bug to have the
requirement dropped?
Eric
February
26, 2016 8:14 AM
technology PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the PMC's
approval of the vote
for Arthur van Dorp's full Committer status on the
technology.scout
project. The next step is for the project lead to return to
the portal and
fill in the VCS package and employer information for Arthur
van Dorp.
The PMC's comments were: .
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO
<emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
Something that's bugged me
for a while is how the portal requires a comment when PMC approves a
committer election. Do we *ever* have anything besides token comments
like "welcome" in there? I don't recall ever seeing a single meaningful
comment in the hundreds of elections we've approved in my time on the
PMC.
Do other project PMC's use meaningful comments?
I found this old bug from 2007
(
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=203314)
where the
requirement was established, but the "guidance about what should be in
the comment" isn't there.
What do you all think about filing a new bug to have the requirement
dropped?
Eric
technology PMC Members,
This
automatically generated message marks the PMC's approval of the vote
for
Arthur van Dorp's full Committer status on the technology.scout
project.
The next step is for the project lead to return to the portal and
fill
in the VCS package and employer information for Arthur van Dorp.
The
PMC's comments were: .
If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO
<emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>_______________________________________________
technology-pmc
mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery
options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
