Re: [technology-pmc] is CQ needed for trivial change mostly changing ind

["Sharon Corbett" <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthias and Gunnar:

Thanks for asking.  We will rely on PMC's judgement in these matters.

Regards,
Sharon


-----Original Message-----
From: Gunnar Wagenknecht [mailto:gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: February-12-16 5:15 AM
To: Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>; emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] is CQ needed for trivial change mostly
changing indentations

Matthias,

Thanks for bringing it up. As I see it, the actual code contribution is a
few lines of code. The majority for changes is formatting change -
potentially done by the Eclipse Java editor. Thus, I'm ok with not needing a
CQ.

IP team, is there a suggestion for handling those contributions in a way
that they don't flood the IP team queue?

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/






> Am 12.02.2016 um 10:52 schrieb Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> I am wondering if we really need to file a CQ for
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/66463
> It's fairly trivial change using try-with-resource to ensure proper
resource management and
> most changed lines are just changing indentation.
> 
> -Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc