We should treat Linux Tools like it belongs to Tools. You may have
to explain the invalid intermediate state to them when you ask for
their approval of the review :-)
Wayne
On 07/16/2012 03:49 PM, Otávio Pontes wrote:
Should I ask in the Tools PCM mailing list an approval
for Linux Tools 1.1 and consider the approval in that list? Or
should I wait for an approval in both lists?
On 07/16/2012 01:23 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
I'm confused.
Linux Tools contributed 1.0 to Juno.
With the 1.0 release, Linux Tools moved to Tools. That move has
not been
completed yet; we're waiting on a move bug [1] for that. We're
in a bit
of an invalid intermediate state at the moment, but you should
probably
involve the Tools PMC in this.
Wayne
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=382579
On 07/13/2012 04:12 PM, Otávio Pontes wrote:
Hi,
The Linux Tools project requests PMC approval for our 1.1
release which
we intend to contribute to Juno. Our IP log has been submitted
(before the deadline) and our release review docuware is here:
http://eclipse.org/linuxtools/doc/LinuxTools1.1ReleaseReview.html
Thanks,
Otavio Pontes
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects <http://www.eclipse.org/projects>
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse
Projects |
