Marcel, can you send a mail to the planning council and just reference this voting thread?
Done. Mail awaits moderator approval.
Gunnar, Markus, thanks for bringing this up again!
On 31.01.2012, at 15:12, Markus Knauer wrote: No, it's not *that* complicated, but as described here (http://www.eclipse.org/helios/planning/EclipseSimultaneousRelease.php#pcExceptionProcess) it is the PMC that needs to bring this to the Planning Council (for final decision). In fact, I don't expect any problems in this case, it just needs to be done.
Thanks,
Markus
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 14:21, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 31.01.2012 10:30, schrieb Markus Knauer:
> Any progress here? It would be nice to have this in M5 and if no one
> else steps up I would be willing to discuss this with the Planning
> Council (apart from the fact that I am not a Technology PMC member).
I'm a little bit confused on the open TODOs here. Frankly, I don't think
that the process is as complicated as it seems from this conversation
and the action items passed between people.
I read the votes and responses as consensus on the PMC to have Code
Recommenders in Juno. Given that we are way past M4 I also consider the
exception for not being in M4 granted as well. Nobody really vetoed that.
The remaining steps are: flip the bit in the portal and send a note to
the planning council that your are joining (late in the game but
approved by the Technology PMC). Marcel, can you send a mail to the
planning council and just reference this voting thread?
-Gunnar
|
