In order to establish merit, a developer must establish a pattern of
providing high-quality contributions to the project. We need more to
go on than this one commit.
Has this commit been pushed into the corresponding eclipse.org
repository? I can find no evidence of it. Which leads me to the next
important question: how can this be? There is clear evidence of
activity in the eclipse.org repositories, so some changes are making
in there. But apparently not all.
Wayne
On 12/20/2011 10:19 AM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 19 Dec 2011, at 20:52, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Hey Hudson folks.
The election of Lucas Panjer cannot be approved until
suitable merit is established in a transparent manner.
The initial nomination notice [1] went out on Dec 2/2011
with only "Initial contributor from Task top." as the
nomination criteria. My concern about the nomination
criteria, sent out a note on Dec 10/2011 [2], has not
received a response.
FWIW, I did try to dig into this myself; I see no evidence
of any prior participation by Lucas in any of Bugzilla,
IPZilla, or in the project's IP Log.
Hi Wayne,
Just FYI, digging into the github/svn history I did find
the following commit by Lucas to Hudson core from last
November:
--
Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________
hudson-dev mailing list
hudson-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/hudson-dev
_______________________________________________
hudson-dev mailing list
hudson-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/hudson-dev
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
  |
