Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Lucas Pa

[Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>]

2011/12/10 Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Greetings PMC.

I'd like to respectfully suggest that we take this approach with elections that we might otherwise veto.

What is important is that the meritocratic process is followed; merit demonstrated on a public thread (even after the election has completed) is good enough, IMHO.

Ultimately, this election may be vetoed if they cannot provide the required demonstration of merit, but I'd like to give them a chance to respond.

Make sense?

+1

As part of the portal election box, we could add a box (and require it) for at least a bug or list of reference commits (since git makes it very easy to track the author of commits). This could at least help remind people when creating the actual committer nomination request.

-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719