Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Paul Tat

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Fellow PMC members,

I have approved these in spite of the terse reason provided in the
nomination. This project never really got off the ground, only having
recently provided us with an initial contribution. The project has been
inactive and dysfunction. Per section 4.6.1, I have the authority to
remove and add committers when the project is in this state. Since it is
easier for the IP team to process committer additions through the
portal, I asked Igor to take that approach.

Igor, in the future, please make sure that all committer nominations are
accompanied by some record of contribution to establish meritocracy.

Thanks,

Wayne

portal on behalf of emo wrote:
> technology PMC Members,
> This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for
> Paul Tatavu's Committer status on the technology.m2e project. As a PMC
> member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My Foundation
> portal page:
>
>     http://portal.eclipse.org/
>
> Paul Tatavu was nominated by Igor Fedorenko as follows:
> We are resuming work on m2e with the very tight constraint to be on the
> release train. We need additional contributors to mean our goals.
>
>
>
> Vote summary: 3/0/0 with 0 not voting 
>   +1  Igor Fedorenko
>   +1  Dmitry Platonoff
>   +1  Jason Van Zyl
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>   

-- 
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org
--
Join me at Eclipse Summit Europe 2010!
http://eclipsesummit.org/