Hi Wayne -
Thanks again for working with us to enhance the visibility of the ACTF
project. In a previous response, Kentarou Fukuda explained some of our
activities. Chieko and I would like to provide additional details based on your
questions:
Question: Who is your target
community? Are there companies, universities, organizations, individuals of an
ilk who should be interested in the project?
We have targeted companies involved in accessibility
tool development and web/software accessibility services. However, most of our
interested community lies among universities and individual interest. Our
primary focus is to get to application tool developers.
Question: Who are your current
adopters?
Thusfar, early adopters involve those who are
interested in the project.
The Paciello
Group (TPG) is using the tools and looking at ways of enhancing the
framework as part of the service offered to
their clients. A few clients, including CA and Ramada are looking at
adopting open source tools for accessibility.
The University of Manchester (UK) is working on
the development of rules-engines for web validation against EU accessibility standards. Additionally, they are developing new visualization features on top of ACTF.
Still, overall adoption is low,
suggesting that we need to increase awareness.
Chieko and I are focusing on increased efforts to reach out to
adopters. Again, we believe that our
early adoptors are tool developers and/or companies looking to imbed the ACTF
tools into their Q/A processes and test suites.
Question: How do you reach out to
people? Are there forums that you can participate in, conferences that you
should attend to meet these people?
Until
now, we have used conferences and email listservs as ways of reaching out.
However, to be perfectly honest, we have not been proactive. So we sincerely appreciate your
prodding.
Last week the
project committers met and determined
that there were a few key conferences that we should be participating in
including ASSETS, CSUN and possibly RESNA. We are conducting a 1-day workshop at ASSETS in October. We recently attended the Eclipse conference.
However, only a few people attended
the session put on by Kentarou and Mike Squillace. We are continue to look at other conferences and forums
and welcome your suggestions.
Question: Does anybody on the team
have a blog aggregated on Planet Eclipse? Is the blogger active? Are there other
blog aggregators that you can hook up to?
We do not have a blog attached to Planet Eclipse --
and this has become an action item for Chieko and myself. There are many
bloggers in the accessibility/software world. Only a few who talk about open
source and none who talk about development on the Eclipse platform. However, we
can certainly create interest through our blogs and generate attention via
Planet Eclipse.
Question: Are you keeping an eye on
the newsgroup? Are questions answered in a timely manner?
I believe Kentarou answered this in his email to you,
but in simple form:
Yes to
both quesitons.
Response
to Your Recommendation: Make things as easy as possible for
those people. Make sure that your site is up-to-date; especially your plan. Make
sure that the conversations you have about the project are captured in a public
forum such as the mailing list or wiki.
We have been doing exactly this, thanks to Kentarou.
He recently updated the project plan that includes our interim releases. Thank
you for the suggestion on the public forum, mailing list, and wiki. We will
follow through on these suggestions.
Question: Is at least one committer
from your project on the technology-pmc mailing list (due to privacy
restrictions, I'm not able to find out myself).
Up until now, Kentarou and Mike have been
following the technology-pmc mailing list. Both are committers. I just
subcribled to the listserv this week, as noted by
this post. We plan to be active in our response and activity on this listserv as
well.
We are open to all your suggestions and would be
happy to talk by conference bridge anytime.
Regards and
thanks,