Hi Bjorn,
I did respond to that e-mail... I do not expect Brian or Spiros to work
on the project again any time soon, but Prof. Johnson should be listed
as the project lead (not me) and should make the call on this. Prof.
Johnson, please respond to Bjorn's questions below ASAP.
Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
Jeff, (w/ cc to the Tools PMC)
This email is a bit unusual because we never officially changed the
project lead to you (you never answered my email of August 15th on the
topic). But I'm assuming your are the Photran project lead. Anyway, as
part of the fall house cleaning, I noticed that two of the committers
on the Photran project appear to be inactive:
http://dash.eclipse.org/dash/commits/web-app/active-committers.cgi?project=technology.photran
bfoote
rjohnson
You also said (in August) that the following committer is no longer on
the project:
sxanthos
Note that being an inactive Committer does not mean that the people are
inactive on the project but it does mean that the person has
not checked any code or web pages into CVS in over nine months.
The Technology Charter requires that Committers stay active in the
project:
http://www.eclipse.org/technology/technology-charter.html
"A Committer that ... does not participate actively, or has been
inactive for an extended period may have his or her commit status
removed by the PMC."
We ask that either:
- You explain why these people should continue to be committers
in
spite of appearing inactive, or
- You tell us to "un-committerize" them. Committers that are
removed can, of course, be reinstated when they resume their active
work on the project.
We also ask that you tell us how the official Project Lead is so that
we can update the records.
Thank you.
|
