[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[technology-pmc] FW: [lepido-dev] Technology PMC Project Review
|
How do we go about archiving this project?
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.eclipse.org
http://wbeaton.blogspot.com/
http://www.planeteclipse.org/planet/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:sylvain@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: March 27, 2006 4:28 AM
> To: Wayne Beaton
> Cc: lepido-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [lepido-dev] Technology PMC Project Review
>
> Wayne Beaton wrote:
> > Hi Sylvain
> >
> > We, the Technology PMC, have been somewhat remiss in our
> duties as a
> > PMC and have not been helping our sub-projects progress and
> flourish.
> > We have made a commitment to ourselves and the community to be more
> > active in 2006. As part of that greater activity, we are
> reviewing the
> > Technology sub-projects one-by-one and have come to the
> Lepido Project.
> >
> > Based on our review of activity in Bugzilla, the mailing list, and
> > news group, it does not appear that the project is
> currently active.
> > There does not appear to have been any code checked into
> CVS for some
> > time. Is there ongoing activity in the Lepido project? Is
> it time to
> > archive the project, or is there something that we in the
> Technology
> > PMC can do to help reinvigorate it?
> >
> > We've addressed this query to you as project lead. We would, of
> > course, be happy to hear from others on the project. Our own PMC
> > minutes can be found here:
> > http://www.eclipse.org/technology/pmc-minutes.php. We
> thank you for
> > your attention.
>
> Wayne,
>
> Although we regret it, the initial committer group (and the backing
> company) has no more time nor resources to invest on the
> Lepido project for the foreseeable future, and close to none
> of the initial interested parties actually contributed.
>
> So, if no other people stand up to get the ball rolling, I
> think we can consider the Lepido project as being inactive
> and therefore archive it.
>
> You can find a discussion on this subject at
> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.technology.lepid
> o/msg00129.html
>
> Sylvain
>
> --
> Sylvain Wallez
> http://bluxte.net
> Apache Software Foundation Member
>
