[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [smila-dev] Checkstyle configuration changes
|
Yes, they all have voted but we don't have an agreement yet.
I added a compromise proposal at the top of the discussion page: http://wiki.eclipse.org/SMILA/Discussions/Checkstyle
Don't want to bother you all again with another voting, so if I get no vote against that compromise until, let's say, mid of next week, I'll apply the compromise changes.
Cheers,
Andreas
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von igor.novakovic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2011 11:44
An: smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [smila-dev] Checkstyle configuration changes
Hi Andreas,
Since all committers (and also one person from the community :-) have voted, you can modify the checkstyle configuration accordingly.
Cheers
Igor
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Andreas.Weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Februar 2011 15:15
An: smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [smila-dev] Checkstyle configuration changes
Hi folks,
having read some postings here about missing checkstyle acceptance, I created a wiki page where I suggested some checkstyle configuration
changes:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/SMILA/Discussions/Checkstyle
I'd appreciate your votings for the suggestions - just add a column at the table with the well known +1 / 0 / -1 values.
Feel free to add some more suggestions if you like.
If we can find an agreement, then I would change the checkstyle configuration afterwards.
Cheers,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
