Type B is "better" than A, but B can be difficult if the tree is
large and there are many contributors.
I see the main value of Type B in being that corporations might
be more inclined to use Type B software than Type A software in
their product.
However, the effort to meet Type B compliance can be large and
could take away from other efforts.
For me, working in academia, Type A is sufficient.
_Christopher
On 3/13/18 11:08 AM, Jay Jay Billings
wrote:
Everyone,
Do you have any thoughts on projects switching between type
A and type B IP due diligence? In type A, licenses are checked
for compatibility. Type B is the classic IP policy that
includes the full provenance check in addition to the license
check of type A.
Jay
--
Jay Jay Billings
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings
_______________________________________________
science-pmc mailing list
science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc
--
Christopher Brooks, PMP
Academic Program Manager
iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm
University of California, Berkeley
707.332.0670, cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxx, https://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cxh
