Re: [science-pmc] Eclipse January 2.1.0 release review for the Science 2

[Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Gosh. That makes it seem so harsh. I figured by now you'd have sorted out that I'm a bit of a push-over.

More seriously, I really do depend on the PMC to provide a sanity check. I need the PMC to tell me that they feel that the project is ready to make the release and that they are satisfied with the level of documentation provided.

The sort of actual due diligence that happens varies by PMC. I look to you to decide what standard you need to have met by your projects.

HTH,

Wayne

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The review was successful, despite no explicit +1 from anyone on the PMC. Wayne/EMO accepted Peter and my implicit approval this time, but will not be making such accommodations in the future.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=522728#c2

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders Ltd.
www.kichwacoders.com

On 22 September 2017 at 22:16, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear PMC,


Eclipse January wants to release v2.1.0 with the coming Science release.

Could you approve the IP log review request :
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14320

And review the release documentation on :
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/science.january/releases/2.1.0 ?


Thanks.
Jonah


~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders Ltd.
www.kichwacoders.com

_______________________________________________
science-pmc mailing list
science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc

--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects

The Eclipse Foundation