The "working group" pages associate projects with a working group
separately from the association with a top level project.
We can associate any project that we'd like with a working group.
The EMO considers that a matter to be discussed between the WG and
the project. You could, for example, decide that an IoT or
Technology project is something that the WG cares about. Only EMO
can actually establish the relationship.
This is mostly useful for working groups that do not have their
own top level project. The project lists should be the same, for
example, for the IoT working group and top level project; the
OpenMDM working group has no top level project and so associates
with a few Eclipse Technology projects.
We also have a feed that provides this information in JSON format
if you're interested.
https://projects.eclipse.org/json/working-group/science/projects
I hope that this makes sense.
Wayne
On 09/02/17 04:10 PM, Torkild Ulvøy
Resheim wrote:
Hi Christopher,
Yes, I think you’re spot on. The plan for the new https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science page was to add content related to the top level project and keep https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science_WG for the Working Group. Thanks for updating the pages!
I believe https://projects.eclipse.org/wg/science/projects is automatically generated. I think I remember some discussion with Wayne regarding it’s contents.
Best regards,
Torkild
9. feb. 2017 kl. 20.22 skrev Christopher Brooks <cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
One of the things that came up in today's call was
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science
I just made some edits to that page. As always, please feel free to heavily edit any of my wiki contributions.
How should we differentiate https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science and https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science_WG?
I see https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science as a page for developers or people who want to learn about and use the Science projects.
I see https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science_WG as a page for the coordination of the Science projects so that we can produce the Science projects used in https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science.
Am I on the right track?
One thing I would like to avoid is duplicated text. For example, we should be careful about how many places we list the Science projects because when we add a project, we need to make updates.
I believe, but I'm not sure, that https://projects.eclipse.org/wg/science/projects is the canonical list of approved Eclipse Science projects, but I have no idea how that is edited.
_Christopher
--
Christopher Brooks, PMP
Academic Program Manager
iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm
University of California, Berkeley
707.332.0670, cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxx, https://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cxh
_______________________________________________
science-pmc mailing list
science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation