Re: [science-pmc] Getting new committers onboard for Science projects

["Torkild U. Resheim" <torkildr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Erwin,

If he don’t have an Eclipse account he must create one first, then just nominate him as a committer using the portal. The project lead don’t have the power to decide alone. As far as I know there does not _have_ to be any prior work, so you should be able to proceed without it.

If the vote succeeds there is some paperwork to do. And then he should be able to contribute without having to file a CQ.

There is a summary of the process at the Wiki[1]. The Eclipse Project Handbook is also a useful resource [2].

Best regards
Torkild

[1] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/Becoming_a_Committer
[2] https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/
-- 
Torkild Ulvøy Resheim
Consultant / Eclipse Committer / Senior Software Developer
Itema AS - http://itema.no

> 20. des. 2016 kl. 10.36 skrev Erwin De Ley <erwin.de.ley@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> Dear Science PMC colleagues,
> 
> We've been in touch with someone who is preparing a very interesting contribution for Triquetrum and is interested to become a committer.
> Christopher and me would definitely like to have him on-board and his work would become a strategic part of Triquetrum.
> 
> I've hit a procedural wall not so long ago when trying to get Jonah accepted as a Triquetrum committer, while still with the technology PMC.
> 
> So I would like to know what the procedure is now for the Science PMC.
> 
> - Can we accept that project leads are able to decide who can become a committer?
> - Or do we still need some "red tape" like e.g. first go through a CQ and me committing his work and then using that as merrit to get him accepted?
> - Or...?
> 
> thanks
> 
> erwin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> science-pmc mailing list
> science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc