Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] EPL2 license change for Vert.x

I've been working on a new set of guidelines. I'm hopeful that I'll be pushing them out into the handbook later today.

The work in progress is in the Dash handbook Git Repository. I don't expect to make any substantial changes to the content as it sits now.

http://git.eclipse.org/c/dash/org.eclipse.dash.handbook.git/tree/source/chapters/legaldoc.adoc

TL;DR:

/********************************************************************************
 * Copyright (c) {date} Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation
 * 
 * See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional
 * information regarding copyright ownership.
 * 
 * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
 * terms of the Eclipse Public License v2.0 which is available at
 * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v20.html, or the Apache License, Version
 * 2.0 which is available at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.
 * 
 * SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 OR Apache-2.0
 ********************************************************************************/

And then keep the copyright notices in a NOTICE file. 

If you notice anything that's bogus, it would be best if you open a bug rather than try to discuss specifics on this thread.

Note that I have done some preliminary work on a script that generates the legal documentation.

https://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/about.php?id=rt.vertx

Please note the experimental nature and intent, and is still evolving. The script a bit sluggish, but  I'll fix that once we get closer to final form. Note that the list of copyrights is not 100% correct (it lists authors, not the companies that likely are the actual copyright holders), but my legal experts tell me that this is good enough (I do intend to update the script to translate authors into companies in those cases where I have that information).

NOTE (this is more for the PMC than for Julien) that projects that build Eclipse Platform Plug-ins will be able to just keep doing what they've always done regarding legal documentation (changing that will be a lot of work for basically no benefit). It's just weird to make projects that aren't doing plug-ins create about.html files...

Wayne

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's a question for the IP Team.

This seems to conflict with the current practise documented here:

It specifically list {INITIAL COPYRIGHT OWNER} {OTHER COPYRIGHT OWNERS}. However, I recall discussion with Wayne that there is something we can do to help (be more flexible for) projects with different practises.

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/






On Sep 25, 2017, at 08:02, Julien Viet <julien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

the project aims to change the license to EPL2 for the next release 3.5

In the commit that updates the header file, some copyright attribution have been changed to a generic attribution, i.e

Copyright 2014 Red Hat, Inc.

to

Copyright (c) 2011-2017 The original author or authors

can you tell me wether that’s fine to do that or we should preserve the original copyright ?

cheers

Julien

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc



--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects
The Eclipse Foundation

Back to the top