Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rmf-dev] Conflict between papyrus and RMF on configuration extension

Hi,

if I look into the sources in git repository (branch develop) I can see several plugin.xml files which register extension parsers:

(1) org.eclipse.rmf.ext.prostep registers extension parser for „prostep“
     => the extension parser should be removed

(2) org.eclipse.rmf.reqif10.pror registers extension parser for „configuration“
     => the extension parser should be removed

(3) org.eclipse.rmf.reqif10.serialization registers extension parser for „reqif“
     => correct. We should keep this extension parser

(4) org.eclipse.rmf.reqif10.xhtml registers extension parser for „xhtml“
     => the extension parser should be removed

Where did you expect the registration of the extension parsers? Did you search in the git repository or in the deployed source bundles?

kind regards

Mark



  


Am 20.02.2015 um 13:33 schrieb MAGGI Benoit <Benoit.MAGGI@xxxxxx>:

Hi,
 
Thanks, it would be perfect for us if you remove the configuration parser from RMF.
 
Do you have an explanation for the fact that it not present in the source but in the package plugins ?
 
Regards,
Benoit Maggi
 
De : rmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de "Mark Brörkens | itemis.de"
Envoyé : vendredi 20 février 2015 13:15
À : Developer mailing list for the Requirements Modeling Framework
Objet : Re: [rmf-dev] Conflict between papyrus and RMF on configuration extension
 
Hi all,
 
RMF should register the file name extensions "reqif" and "reqifz" only. 
 
Thus, we (RMF project) should remove the other extension parsers (e.g. "configuration")
 
I can fix it for the upcoming release 0.12.0.
 
Regards Mark
 
 
Am 20.02.2015 um 11:34 schrieb Michael Jastram <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>:
 
Hi Benoit,

I CC'd Matthieu (also from CEA), who may be able to help you: He worked on the Papyrus integration with RMF in the openETCS-Project.

Hope this helps!

Best,

- Michael    

    
On 19.02.2015 15:26, MAGGI Benoit wrote:
Hi everyone,
 
I come to you trying to solve this issue [1]
 
When installing both Papyrus and RMF there is the following log on the console
!MESSAGE Both 'org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.viewpoints.configuration' and 'org.eclipse.rmf.reqif10.pror' register an extension parser for 'configuration'
 
The main problem is that both papyrus and rmf define aorg.eclipse.emf.ecore.extension_parser for type="configuration"
 
I didn’t find any simple solution for that.
-        Advice to register only locally [2]
-        Maybe customizing the factories [3]
 
Here are the questions :
-        Did anyone has any simple idea on how to solve it ?
-        How is generated the extension point in org.eclipse.rmf\org.eclipse.rmf.reqif10.pror\plugin.xml ?
o   If manually then it should be present in src
o   I tried a org.eclipse.rmf/org.eclipse.rmf.releng/mvn clean package. (Failed looking fororg.eclipse.rmf.releng.target\${platform.version.name})
 
Regards,
Benoit Maggi
 
 



_______________________________________________
rmf-dev mailing list
rmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rmf-dev


-- 
Dr. Michael Jastram
+49 (162) 274 83 94
Geschäftsführer
Formal Mind GmbH
Gründer
rheinjug e.V.
Project Lead
Eclipse Requirements Modeling Framework
_______________________________________________
rmf-dev mailing list
rmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rmf-dev
 
_______________________________________________
rmf-dev mailing list
rmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rmf-dev


Back to the top