[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[rmf-dev] affectedObjects
|
Dear all,
I have almost finished an implementation of changing the lastChange
attribute, taking a recommendation from EdMerks on from one of the
forums from 2009.
During my test, I noticed that ProR seems to use a specific concept of
what the affected object of e.g. the setting of an attribute seems to be.
When the attribute of a SpecObject is modified, the it seems that ProR
overrides that so that the related SpecHierarchy is the affectedObject.
Is that true?
What is the intention behind that? I would have expected that the
affected object really is the "affected object", i.e. either the
attribute value or the specObject.
Best Regards,
Andreas
--
Andreas Graf
Business Development Manager Automotive
Spokesperson Eclipse Automotive Industry WG
Mobil: +49 (0) 151-10860479 (preferred)
Tel.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-0
Fax.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-29
Web: http://www.itemis.de
Mail: andreas.graf@xxxxxxxxx
Xing: http://www.xing.com/profile/Andreas_Graf
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/grafandreas
Blog: http://5ise.quanxinquanyi.de
itemis GmbH
Meitnerstr. 10
D-70563 Stuttgart
Rechtlicher Hinweis:
Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 50700996
Ust.Id.Nr.: DE250574762
Geschäftsführer: Sebastian Neus
