Formality wise, very little beyond announcements. Be careful to call it a milestone build, not a release. No IP log necessary yet.
Hardest problem is that you will have to run the deployment manually, since the release script does not work for milestones (for one thing, it only works on the master branch, and milestones are typically done from develop). Either that, or merge develop into master now - which means 3.3.0 finalization from here on in happens on master, and develop upgrades to 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT. Downside of that is that makes it a bit harder to run a 3.2.3 patch release if we still want one.
Either approach is ok with me, we're close enough to a 3.3 release that I'm not that worried about being blocked for a patch version. Just keep us all in the loop on what you choose to do.
Cheers,
Jeen
Yeah, I was wondering about that. Any formalities involved?
I thought I would do one tomorrow.
Håvard
Btw Havard if you want to do a milestone build (or want me to do one) give me a bit of a heads up on when and how you wish to proceed. At your discretion pretty much.
Cheers,
Jeen
I don't think I had a definite date in mind yet, myself, for 3.3.0, but it's certainly worth discussing of course.
And yes, the release review process has been relaxed. We do still need to get the IP log reviewed prior to release, but no formal release review is necessary if it's been less than a year since the previous release review.
Shall we drop a pin on July 16 as release date? That gives us a little time to finish a few more items and do some QA as well where necessary. If we do that, I'd like to freeze the IP log for review by July 9, so that we have a week to get it approved (obviously assuming that no surprises crop up in the log).
Jeen
Hi,
I'm wondering if we have any timeline for releasing 3.3.0?
There are a fair amount of SHACL features on develop already, and a few more in the pipeline. I'm not sure when things will be done, but I'm wondering about sometime in july.
I remember that there was a change to the release review process. Can we forego a review entirely, or just IP Log review?
Håvard
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev