Re: [rdf4j-dev] Lucene/ES cq's approved

[Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx>]

In fact, thinking about it a bit more, unless there's major objections, I'd like to postpone merging the Lucene/Solr/ES upgrades in for 2.5 regardless, and save it for the 3.0 release. It will save us the hassle of having to re-approve our IP log (which has already been approved for the 2.5 release, without these CQs included), and more importantly will give us time to check everything works as expected. With the upgrade pains that some of our users experienced the last time in mind, I want to make sure we have things lined up properly.

Jeen

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:36 AM Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Great stuff!

Before we go ahead and merge though, I'd like to make sure that the version bump doesn't cause major issues. Please be aware that a significant part of the test suite for ElasticSearch in particular is disabled due to its resource demands on Jenkins (it's on my todo list to come up with a solution for that but until that's done we should probably at least make sure that we can run these tests locally, and possibly also take these sail implementations for a manual test ride).

Jeen

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:10 AM Bart Hanssens (BOSA) <bart.hanssens@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Seems like all CQ’s for Lucene/Solr/ES have been approved. Progress !

 

Best regards

 

Bart

_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev