[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [pde-dev] Discontinue API Tools ( was Re: What do API tools want here?)
|
> I understand and agree that the current situation is unpleasant or
> better annoying.
611 failing test anyone? ;-)
That's just another example, we have random failures, none seem to know
why or what can be done even though we have tried some things but it
still occurs.
> In case it would require more time/effort to adjust the existing code
> base to the new tooling (e.g. remove all required-bundles) it could be
> simpler to fix the PDE API-tools instead.
For sure it depends on the tooling, and I won't recommend to just
migrate everything, but it seems code debt for API tools is increasing
and actually no one "simply fix it" even simple(?) ones like [1] just
hanging around.
So it is better to decide if there is a future for API tools or if we
better look *now* for alternatives and let user know there is most
likely no more support for them (similar for pde-build that seems
unmaintained for a long time as well!).
[1] https://github.com/eclipse-pde/eclipse.pde/issues/124
Am 05.11.22 um 22:19 schrieb Hannes Wellmann:
I understand and agree that the current situation is unpleasant or
better annoying.
Nevertheless we need some form of API tooling and I don't know if other
techniques and tools can deal better with the PDE specialties like
re-exported Required-Bundles (which is likely causing your issues)?
What would be the alternatives in this case?
In case it would require more time/effort to adjust the existing code
base to the new tooling (e.g. remove all required-bundles) it could be
simpler to fix the PDE API-tools instead.
Using Re-export in general is bad and I fully agree/support improving
PDE's Import-Package support in general but since probably many rely on
re-exported require-bundle that it will take some time and discussion to
get rid of that and will probably not work until there is a equivalent
convenient solution available (like automatically calculated
Import-Packages)
But my blind guess is that other tools (probably from BND?) would also
have their difficulties with that.
> as even the build-setup is horrible complex and hard to perform
including calling helper mojos and ant scripts.
Since we are working on a API-tools plugin at Tycho, that problem should
no longer exists in the not to distance future (I hope to have time to
continue my work on that soon).
Furthermore I had the intention to improve PDE's API tools in the future
with regard to detecting necessary version bumps in Features and Plugins
already in the IDE.
That being said, if there is a 'drop-in' replacement for PDE's API tools
I would not object to use that instead.
But I would not assume that such immediate drop-in exists, but please
correct me if I'm wrong.
Nevertheless, if a suitable library exists we could consider to use that
in the core of PDE's API tools and add reasonable PDE specialties on top
of that.
Greetings,
Hannes
*Gesendet:* Samstag, 05. November 2022 um 15:31 Uhr
*Von:* "Christoph Läubrich" <laeubi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*An:* pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
*Betreff:* [pde-dev] Discontinue API Tools ( was Re: What do API tools
want here?)
So now three month later, still no one know why API tools complains, or
even what the error message means. Ed has done some analysis and even
found that all quick fixes are broken here and even adding code in mini
steps do not help any further.
For me the question is if there is no support, no maintenance or
development available if it is time to discontinue API tools, as even
the build-setup is horrible complex and hard to perform including
calling helper mojos and ant scripts.
SO if PDE itself can't master its own API tools I think its time to face
the truth and recommend to stop using it and migrate to other techniques.
Am 06.08.22 um 08:16 schrieb Christoph Läubrich:
> Hi PDE-Devs,
>
> I have a strange error from the API tools and no clue what it want here,
> the error is:
>
> The type org.eclipse.pde.ui.launcher.AbstractPDELaunchConfiguration has
> been removed from org.eclipse.pde.ui_3.14.0
>
> see build [1]
> and PR [2]
>
> Any hint would be welcome ... I think it would be the best to directly
> add any comments to the PR.
>
>
> [1]
https://ci.eclipse.org/pde/job/eclipse.pde.ui/job/PR-214/6/consoleFull
<https://ci.eclipse.org/pde/job/eclipse.pde.ui/job/PR-214/6/consoleFull>
> [2] https://github.com/eclipse-pde/eclipse.pde/pull/214
<https://github.com/eclipse-pde/eclipse.pde/pull/214>
> _______________________________________________
> pde-dev mailing list
> pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev
<https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev>
_______________________________________________
pde-dev mailing list
pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev
<https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev>
_______________________________________________
pde-dev mailing list
pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev