Thanks, Charles.
I shall proceed on that assumption and hope that I won’t have to backtrack. 😉
Christian
On 20 June, 2016 at 12:59:55, charles+zeligsoft.com (charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Hi Christian,
I have proposed a plan where Papyrus-RT 0.8
would align with Neon.1. This plan has yet to be approved by the
Papyrus IC product management and steering committees.
/Charles
Hi,
I’m looking at a bug in the model
import that should be fixed for the Papyrus-RT 0.8
release. However, fixing this bug requires new work in
Papyrus (specifically, the RSA Import “extra” component).
So far, Papyrus-RT has been targeting a release on Papyrus Neon,
but now that Papyrus-RT 0.8 has been re-scheduled, on which release
of Papyrus will it be based? Still Neon.0? That would
make bugs like this difficult to address. Or will there be a
Papyrus 2.0.1/2.1 before the simultaneous Neon.1 release? Or
will Papyrus-RT 0.8 wait to target the Neon.1 simultaneous
release?
Thanks,
Christian
_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev
_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev
|