I do not have such access.
As far as I know Remi doesn't have it as well.
The quickest would be to open a ticket.
Regards
Céline
Le 30/03/2016 20:10, Christian Damus a
écrit :
Thanks,
Camille,
Surely
somebody on this mailing list has the requisite admin access to
the HIPP. I agree that we can have no need for the 32-bit VM.
On 30 March, 2016 at 12:14:37, LETAVERNIER
Camille (camille.letavernier@xxxxxx)
wrote:
FWIW, on the Papyrus Hudson instance, I had to manually
configure
the JDK-8 variable to the following:
jdk1.8.0-latest = /shared/common/jdk1.8.0_x64-latest
I had to do this because, at the time, it wasn't
pre-configured by
webmasters. I don't know how much this has changed now.
If someone
has admin rights on the Papyrus-RT HIPP, then he can
configure
something similar. Otherwise, you need to open a ticket
on Bugzilla
so that Webmasters can take care of that for you
HTH,
Camille
hi, Peter,
I don’t know what the XULRunner is for. But in
any case my
work-around doesn’t work because 32-bit SWT fails
to resolve
libpthread. So I’m stuck until I can get a
64-bit Java
8.
Christian
_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev
_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev
--
|
Céline
JANSSENS
Software
Engineer
+33 (0)2 44 47 23 23
|
|
Mail : cej@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
6 rue Léonard De Vinci - BP 0119 - 53001 LAVAL
Cedex - FRANCE
www.all4tec.net
|
|
|