[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [orbit-dev] EBR way of patching class from upstream JAR?
|
Roland Grunberg wrote:
>> So we need a separate CQ for a modified Lucene Core 5.2.1. Fine.
>>
>> I just wonder on behalf of which project I should file this CQ, assuming
>> that we would still need a *separate* Add-to-Orbit CQ. Should I file a
>> CQ on behalf of tools.orbit [1] and then, once that is approved, on
>> behalf of tools.orbit another ATO CQ? Seems like a lot of hoops to jump
>> through...
>
> I think any project could file the CQ (ideally not Orbit as we
> generally don't file the first CQ itself) and the subsequent ATO CQ
> shouldn't take long to complete.
Filed the two CQs (for Lucene 5.2.1 and 6.1.0) on behalf of the Code
Recommenders project now:
<http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13725>
<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13728>
Once they have been approved, I will file the ATO CQs and note them in
the Gerrit change [1]. Once the ATO CQs are approved, we can submit the
Gerrit change and publish a new I-build.
Best wishes,
Andreas
[1] <https://git.eclipse.org/r/98804/>
--
Codetrails GmbH
The knowledge transfer company
Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt
Phone: +49-6151-276-7092
Mobile: +49-170-811-3791
http://www.codetrails.com/
Managing Director: Dr. Marcel Bruch
Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 91940
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature