Hi All,
Thanks for your responses.
1. Yes, the project in sourceforge has also changed the name
(lpg.runtime.java), not only the java packages which the project
contains (lpg.runtime), so taking into account the received feedback I
think that I'll create a new project with the new namespace.
2. Ok, I had thought to create a temporal project in my workspace and
work with it until IP approval is granted, but taking into account the
previous point, I'll have to create a project anyway, so... all clear !!
Thank you very much for the help !!
Regards,
Adolfo.
Thomas Watson escribió:
Hi Adolfo.
I would opt for a new project (net.sourceforge.lpg.runtime) in orbit if
the name of the bundle is changing from
net.sourceforge.lpg.lpgjavaruntime to net.sourceforge.lpg.runtime. I
think it would be confusing to keep the correctly named bundle
net.sourceforge.lpg.runtime under an incorrectly named project
net.sourceforge.lpg.lpgjavaruntime in CVS.
I would wait for IP approval before creating a new project
(net.sourceforge.lpg.runtime) or branching the existing one.
Tom
Adolfo
Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera ---12/10/2009 06:00:05 AM---Hi David and
everybody,
Hi David and everybody,
I'm starting with the inclusion of a new version of the LPG runtime
library into Orbit (my first one :) ), which already resides in the
net.sourceforge.lpg.lpgjavaruntime Orbit's bundle.
The CQ will be processed by Robert Fuhrer (IMP project's leader) who is
also interested in having this library into Orbit.
However, I have a couple of trivial questions to the group:
- The LPG runtime v2.0.17 has some differences in the namespace of the
packages which contains, so a probably better name for the bundle could
be "net.sourceforge.lpg.runtime". However, since the library itself is
an evolution of its predecessor (LPG v1.0 and v.1.1), I think that I
should better create a new branch for the (probably worst named for LPG
v2.0.17) net.sourceforge.lpg.lpgjavaruntime bundle. An addition opinion
about this would be welcomed.
- I'm quite sure that the IP process will be successfully passed, since
Robert has already done it with similar LPGv2.0.x versions. Could I
create the correspondent 2_0_17 branch in the CVS or should I wait
until IP approval ?
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards,
Adolfo.
--
|
Adolfo
Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera
adolfosbh(at)opencanarias(dot)com
C/Elías Ramos González, 4, ofc. 304
38001 SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE
Tel.: +34 922 240231 / +34 617 718268 |
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
--
|
Adolfo
Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera
adolfosbh(at)opencanarias(dot)com
C/Elías Ramos González, 4, ofc. 304
38001 SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE
Tel.: +34 922 240231 / +34 617 718268 |
|