Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [orbit-dev] Confirmation of need for "ouput..=."?


>  is there an enhancement we can request to make that "error message"
> a little smarter about these cases, and not flag it as an error?


Never mind. I decided this was saying something different than I thought, and is a bug. I have opened bug 297115.  
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=297115




From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To: Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/07/2009 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] Confirmation of need for "ouput..=."?
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx






Thanks DJ and Tom. From reading those bugs, this doesn't really sound like a temporary work around, but just the way it has to work. If that's the case, is there an enhancement we can request to make that "error message" a little smarter about these cases, and not flag it as an error? I would request it, but I have a feeling one of you could actually word it correctly. :)


Thanks,




From: DJ Houghton <DJ_Houghton@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/07/2009 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] Confirmation of need for "ouput..=."?
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx






I also found a reference in this bug report.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=221699



Inactive hide details for Thomas Watson ---12/07/2009 11:26:06 AM---I think this is needed by PDE-BUILD to allow our binary (clThomas Watson ---12/07/2009 11:26:06 AM---I think this is needed by PDE-BUILD to allow our binary (class folders) to be used for compilation a

From:

Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>

To:

Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

12/07/2009 11:26 AM

Subject:

Re: [orbit-dev] Confirmation of need for "ouput..=."?

Sent by:

orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx






I think this is needed by PDE-BUILD to allow our binary (class folders) to be used for compilation at build time. (See
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=99286 and https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146042)

I still think we will have issues in PDE/BUILD if we remove this entry.

Tom



Inactive hide details for David M Williams---12/07/2009 10:05:34 AM---With the new M4-ish Eclipse IDE, there is better checkingDavid M Williams---12/07/2009 10:05:34 AM---With the new M4-ish Eclipse IDE, there is better checking of build.properties values.

From:

David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

To:

Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

12/07/2009 10:05 AM

Subject:

[orbit-dev] Confirmation of need for "ouput..=."?







With the new M4-ish Eclipse IDE, there is better checking of build.properties values.

One of those "errors" says

The folder "." does not exist in the workspace


where ever we have
output..=.


in our build.properties files.

But we do still need those output directives there, right?

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Adding_Bundles_to_Orbit#build.properties_entries_and_.classpath_file

I think this was to work around some PDE bug, but I couldn't find reference to it.

Anyone know if its still a bug, and we still need the work around?

I mostly wanted to make sure Orbit committers didn't start removing them, since after all, Eclipse says its an error! :)

Unless its ok to remove now?!


_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev



Back to the top